STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Beforethe PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Rebuttal Testimony of Paul M. Normand National Grid NH Docket DG 10-017 REBUTTAL TESTIMONY.

 

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DT 07-011 AND FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. TRANSFER OF NEWHAMP JOINT REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL BROWN,.

 

EXHIBIT NO. ___ JAD-1T PREFILED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY NONCONFIDENTIAL OF DR. JEFFREY A. DUBIN Prefiled Rebuttal Testimony Exhibit No. ___ JAD-1T Nonconfidential of Page i of i Dr. Jeffrey.

 

26 PEGGYBRYAN EXHIBITNO. 41. 01r PEGGYBRYAN EXHIBITNO. 41. 01R. 2009-01: PROJECT EXHIBITNO. 41. 01R WITNESS 2:PEGGYBRYAN Q A. Michaels. Q testimony.

 

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DT 07-011 AND FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. TRANSFER OF NEWHAMP JOINT REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL BROWN,.

 

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Pittsfield Aqueduct Company, Inc. DocketNo. DW08-052 JOINT REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF DONALDL. WAREAND BONALYN J. HARTLEY.

 

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF ROBERT A. BAUMANN A ND STEPHEN R. HALL CUSTOMER MIGRATION Docket No. DE 10-160.

 

NH DKT 07-011 EXHIBIT JFN-III Rebuttal Testimony of John F. Nestor, III New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission, DT 07-011 Re Verizon New England et al. OCA Responses to Verizon.

 

SCG Doc 259920 SRW-i TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION. 1 II. REASONABLE LIMITS TO USE OF DAT A WITHIN THE GRC SCHEDULE. 1 SCG Doc 259920 SRW-1 PREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONYOF 1 SCOTT R. WILDER.

 

Docket No. DE 10-188 Prefiled Rebuttal Testimony of Eric Stanley and Thomas Palma December 19,20110 Page 9 of9 1 IV. NATIONAL GRID NH S BENEFIT COST.

 

Docket No. DE 10-188 Prefiled Rebuttal Testimony of Eric Stanley and Thomas Palma December 19,20110 Page 9 of9 1 IV. NATIONAL GRID NH S BENEFIT COST.

 

Applicant’s Submittal of Rebuttal Testimony Calico Solar,LLC Tessera Solar North America 4800 N. Scottsdale Rd. Suite 5500 Scottsdale, AZ 85251.

 

Rebuttal Testimony of Ann E. Leary National Grid NH Docket DG 10-017 Page 2 of6 II. REVENUE ADJUSTMENT 1 Q. Please summarize Staff’s proposed revenue adjustment.

 

NH DKT 07-011 EXHIBIT JFN-V Rebuttal Testimony of John F. Nestor Verizon New England Inc. d/b/a Verizon New Hampshire State of New Hampshire Docket No. DM 05-172.

 

NH DKT 07-011 EXHIBIT JFN-V Rebuttal Testimony of John F. Nestor Verizon New England Inc. d/b/a Verizon New Hampshire State of New Hampshire Docket No. DM 05-172.

 

Rebuttal Testimony of Ann E. Leary National Grid NH Docket DG 10-017 Page 2 of6 II. REVENUE ADJUSTMENT 1 Q. Please summarize Staff’s proposed revenue adjustment.

 

NH DKT 07-011 EXHIBIT JFN-V Rebuttal Testimony of John F. Nestor Verizon New England Inc. d/b/a Verizon New Hampshire State of New Hampshire Docket No. DM 05-172.

 

3568782. 1 MPUC Docket No. OAH Docket No. 12-2500-17260-2.

 

MPUC Docket No. OAH Docket No. 12-2500-17260-2.

 

To Whom It May Concern: At Seattle Public Schools we are implementing a 5-year strategic plan, “Excellence For All. ” Our commitment is that every school is an excellent school.

 

To Whom It May Concern: At Seattle Public Schools we are implementing a 5-year strategic plan, “Excellence For All. ” Our commitment is that every school is an excellent school.

 

REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF JOHN P. GLUSKO CASES 08-E-0887 08-G-0888 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Q. What is the purpose of your rebuttal testimony A. The purpose of my rebuttal testimony is to provide.

 

Purpose of Rebuttal Testimony Q. What is the purpose of your rebuttal testimony A. In my rebuttal testimony I address several of the objections to the Revised Protocol presented.

 

A. Yes. Purpose of Testimony Q. What is the purpose of your rebuttal testimony A. I will respond to the line loss values proposed by Division of Public Utilities.

 

Q. What is the purpose of your rebuttal testimony A. The purpose of my testimony is to rebut specific comments made by Charles Black, witness for Public Counsel,.

 

BEFORE THE WASHINGTON UTILIT IES TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION WUTC V. CASCADE NATURALGAS CROSS-REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL L. BROSCH MLB-13T ON BEHALF OF PUBLIC COUNSEL.

 

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF UTAH REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF BART S. CROXFORD FOR THE DIVISION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE STATE OF UTAH.

 

A. Yes, I filed direct testimony in this proceeding. Q. Please describe the purpose of your rebuttal testimony. A. The purpose of my rebuttal testimony is twofold.

 

STOE L RIVESLLP900 SWFifthAvenue , OR 97204Main 503 224-3380 Fax 503 26 70445560. 10029409 - 00001 GYLLC H,JR. STIMONY EXHIBITNO. 13. 00 r WASHINGTON. WHIST EXHIBITNO. 13. 00r WITNESS.

 

Q. Are you the same Samuel C. Hadaway who previously filed direct testimony in this proceeding A. Yes. Q. What is the purpose of your rebuttal testimony A. The purpose of my rebuttal.

 

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF UTAH IN THE MATTER OF THE Docket No. 03-035-14 APPLICATION OF PACIFICORP FOR AN ORDER APPROVING REBUTTAL TESTIMONY AVOIDED COST.

 

EXHIBIT NO. RCR-6T PREFILED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY NONCONFIDENTIAL OF R. CLAY RIDING Prefiled Rebuttal Testimony Exhibit No. RCR-6T Nonconfidential of R. Clay Riding.

 

Southern California Edison Rebuttal Testimony on Bill Calculation Services For Submetered Mobile Home Parks Before the Public Utilities Commission.

 

SDG E Doc 270791 Application: A. 12-04-015, etal Exhibit No. : Witness: Don Widjaja PREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF DON WIDJAJA ON BEHALF OF SAN DIE GO GAS ELECTRIC COMPANY BEFORE THE PUBLIC.

 

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Pittsfield Aqueduct Company, Inc. DocketNo. DW08-052 JOINT REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF DONALDL. WAREAND BONALYN J. HARTLEY.

 

UNITIL ENERGY SYSTEM S,INC REBUTTAL TESTIMONYOF GEORGE R. GANTZ NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UT ILITIES COMMISSION DE09-137 JANUARY 28,2009 TABLE.

 

Downeast Reliability Project Town of Franklin Special Exception and Shoreland Zoning Permit Application Rebuttal Testimony for Public Hearing Opened.

 

Q. Are you the same Samuel C. Hadaway who previously filed direct testimony in this proceeding A. Yes. Q. What is the purpose of your rebuttal testimony A. The purpose of my rebuttal.

 

Southern California Edison Rebuttal Testimony on Bill Calculation Services For Submetered Mobile Home Parks Before the Public Utilities Commission.

 

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF UTAH IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF WWC HOLDING CO. , INC. FOR ARBITRATION OF INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT DOCKET NO. 03-2403-02 REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF RAYMOND.

 

Rebuttal Testimony of William M. Stout, P. E. On Depreciation Issues In Southern California Edison 2006 General Rate Case California Public Utilities.

 

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF UTAH Questar Gas Company to Increase Pre-filed Rebuttal Testimony of Distribution Non-Gas Rates and David E. Dismukes,.

 

Docket: DE10-195 Page 1 of 47 George E. Sansoucy, P. E. , LLC January 2011 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSIOND NO. DE10-195 REBUTTAL.

 

Before The Public Service Commission of Utah Proposed Electric Service Schedules And Regulations Docket No. 04-035-42 DPU Exhibit 7. 0R Rebuttal Testimony Andrea.

 

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF UTAH IN THE MATTER OF THE Docket No. 03-035-14 APPLICATION OF PACIFICORP FOR AN ORDER APPROVING REBUTTAL TESTIMONY AVOIDED COST.

 

UNITIL ENERGY SYSTEM S,INC REBUTTAL TESTIMONYOF THOMAS PALMA,ESQ. NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DE09-137 JANUARY 28, 2010 TABLE.

 

A. Yes. Q. What is the purpose of your rebuttal testimony A. The purpose of my testimony is to rebut the testimony related to the Company’s requested retirement plan pension expense.

 

REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF LARRY G. ARVIDSON CASES 08-E-0887 08-G-0888 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Q. Are you the same Larry G. Arvidson who submitted prefiled direct testimony and supplemental testimony.

 

Exhibit No. : SCG – Witness: Edward J. Reyes DRAFT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY compression services Tariff REBUTTAL TESTIMONY Prepared Direct Rebuttal.