, 05-1006 Fed. Cir. Sept. 16, 2005 Dyk, J. Disagreeing with the district court’s claim construction for multiple claim terms in Free Motion’s patents.

 

presumption of claim scope surrender arising from the amendment.

 

, 03-1092 Fed. Cir. Sept. 14, 2005 Linn, J. Under an order directing the original panel to reconsider Nystrom v. Trex Co. ,Inc. , 374 F. 3d 1105 Fed. Cir. 2004 , in light.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 02- 1517, -1518 ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. , Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS, INC. , Defendant - Appellant.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 03-1117 THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MEE INDUSTRIES, INC. and FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION, Defendants.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 03-1609 JUICY WHIP, INC. , v. ORANGE BANG, INC. , UNIQUE BEVERAGE DISPENSERS, INC. , DAVID FOX,.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 03-1534, -1535 LIGHTING WORLD, INC. , v. BIRCHWOOD LIGHTING, INC. , Defendant-Cross Appellant. Ezra Sutton.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2006-1562 EGYPTIAN GODDESS, INC. , and ADI TORKIYA, Third Party Defendant, v. SWISA, INC. and DROR SWISA,.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-1414 BIAGRO WESTERN SALES, INC. and THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, v. GROW MORE, INC. ,. Mark.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 05-1006 FREE MOTION FITNESS, INC. formerly known as Ground Ze ro Design Corporation , v. CYBEX.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-1069 PANDROL USA, LP and PANDROL LIMITED, v. AIRBOSS RAILWAY PRODUCTS, INC. , AIRBOSS OF AMERICA.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-1154 , Latham Watkins LLP, of Menl o Park, California, argued for. With him on the brief.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 03-1092 RON NYSTROM, v. TREX COMPANY, INC. and TREX COMPANY, LLC,. Joseph S. Presta , Nixon.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-1446 CYTOLOGIX CORPORATION, v. VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. ,. Jack R. Pirozzolo , Willcox, Pirozzolo.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-1445 and CRS, LLC, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION,. Robert E. Rohde , Rohde Van Kampen PLLC,.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-1022 POLY-AMERICA, L. P. , v. GSE LINING TECHNOLOGY, INC. ,. Jerry R. Selinger , Jenkens Gilchrist, of Dallas, Texas,.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-1100 , Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper Sc into, of New York, New York, argued for. With her on the brief.

 

, 04-1570b Fed. Cir. Sept. 30, 2005 Lourie, J. The court affirmed the summary judgme nt that Enzo’s patent for “nucleic acid probes that selectively.

 

, 987 F. 2d 1392, 1400 9th Cir. 1993. In Gates.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 03-1092 RON NYSTROM, v. TREX COMPANY, INC. and TREX COMPANY, LLC,. Joseph S. Presta , Nixon.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-1451 SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. , ACCU-SORT SYSTEMS, INC. , INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORP. , ME TROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS,.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 03-1052 GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC. and STARSIGHT TELECAST, INC. , Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,.

 

Tokyo Electron America, Inc.